About Adi Shmorak

Adi Shmorak against an amber wall

Fractional CPO. Product/Market Fit Detective. Based in Jerusalem, working with founders everywhere.

Why a detective

As a kid, I read detective books all the time, often under the covers with a flashlight. It started with Enid Blyton: the Famous Five, the Secret Seven, and the Adventure Series with Kiki the parrot. But my real hero was Sherlock Holmes: logical, methodical and creative in the way he solved mysteries. That was for me. I decided that when I grew up, I’d be a detective.

I didn’t become a detective. I went into sales, then marketing, business development and finally product. But I still solve mysteries, and I still solve them the way Holmes taught me: backwards.

In 2019 I started mentoring early-stage startups at MassChallenge on their P/MF challenges. Founders’ questions felt like riddles, part of a bigger mystery. I’ve been solving them ever since.

Reasoning backwards

When a founder asks me, “Is my startup idea any good?”, I don’t start with “Can we build it?” I start at the end: can we sell it? Can we get to the moment where someone says, “Wow, that’s a great offer. Yes, I want that”?

From there I work back. If they want it, why do they want it? What does it have to deliver? How can we deliver it? I keep going back until I understand what needs to be built.

“In solving a problem of this sort, the grand thing is to be able to reason backwards. That is a very useful accomplishment, and a very easy one, but people do not practise it much.”
Sherlock Holmes, A Study in Scarlet (1887)

Rereading my hero

A few years ago, a client who knew this story gave me the complete Sherlock Holmes. I was nervous to open it. He was my childhood hero, and I wasn’t sure I wanted to revisit him as a grown-up.

I did, and I loved it. This time I could see how closely the way he thinks matches the way I look at P/MF. A lot of lines hit home. I owe a lot of how I work to the Holmes stories I read again and again as a kid.

Holmes on product/market fit

“It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.”
A Scandal in Bohemia (1891)Fit the theory to the evidence, never the other way round.
“Data! Data! Data! I can’t make bricks without clay.”
The Adventure of the Copper Beeches (1892)No evidence, no conclusions.
“You see, but you do not observe.”
A Scandal in Bohemia (1891)Watch what users do, not only what they say.
“There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact.”
The Boscombe Valley Mystery (1891)Sign-ups and compliments look like proof. They rarely are.
“It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important.”
A Case of Identity (1891)The small signals in usage show you who your ICP really is.
“I never guess. It is a shocking habit, destructive to the logical faculty.”
The Sign of Four (1890)Every assumption gets a test.
“Nothing clears up a case so much as stating it to another person.”
Silver Blaze (1892)Talk your case through out loud. Holes show up fast.

How I work

I help founders solve the four variables of Product/Market Fit, in order:

  1. ICP: who it's for
  2. Value Proposition: why they should care
  3. Product: how you deliver on the promise
  4. Business Model: how value comes back to you

The tools are assumptions, experiments and decisions. The method is backward reasoning: start from the evidence and work back to the cause.

I'm not a consultant who hands over a deck and leaves. I get my skin in the game and join you in the trenches.

What founders say

Read testimonials from founders I’ve worked with.

Elsewhere

Talk to Adi